THE GATEWAY TO THE UNKNOWN
Active areas of reported Lunar Transient Phenomena
For all of the talk of conspiracies and speculations, it’s hard these days to ascertain what actually has any merit or is just a good story. But there are a couple of topics of which I am fully convinced that there is more to than what we are told in the public domain. One is our ancient history, as Graham Hancock perfectly describes us as “a species with amnesia” and more than that there seems to be a strange and unexplainable active suppression of any solid evidence (of which there is a plethora of) that contradicts the mainstream narrative. The other topic that I am convinced that there is more to is the Moon. This is something I never gave any thought to up until a few years ago but when I began to research these things I became fully convinced that there is absolutely something strange about our Moon. Anyone who spends any amount of time researching the oddities of our Moon must either ignore these anomalies, waving them off as coincidence or realize that when so many “coincidences” are taken as a whole we have to ask deeper questions, no matter how uncomfortable those answers may be to learn.
Telescopic photograph, fully verified by Columbia University, taken in 1953 of a bright flash of light on the surface of the moon; one of hundreds of reported sightings of Transient Lunar Phenomena.
summary of the strangeness
THE EFFECTS ON THE ASTRONAUTS
The interviews with the Apollo 11 crew after they returned from the moon. The mood is somber, not what you might expect from the first man to walk on the moon. Maybe they were exhausted or nervous being on camera perhaps?
However, here is Neil Armstrong on the 25th anniversary of the moon landing giving a speech to a group of young people telling of great revelations to be found by “those who can remove one of truth’s protective layers”. This is a strange statement to make and also a rare moment when he looks up from his written speech for this comment. What is this referencing?
There’s a lot to consider here. As always, I’m just sharing information that I find fascinating but that also seems to have enough merit to be taken seriously. Until more information is seriously studied and released, any conclusions we try to reach will be speculation. But solely based on the observables about the moon that we know to be true, one has to concede that the moon cannot be described in any way close to what we have been taught. Here’s a few profound statements from credentialed experts in their field:
NASA scientist, Dr. Robin Brett, is quoted as saying, “It seems much easier to explain the nonexistence of the moon than its existence.”
Irwin Shapiro of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics stated, “the best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error - the moon doesn’t exist.” He also said, “The Moon is bigger than it should be, apparently older than it should be and much lighter in mass than it should be. It occupies an unlikely orbit and is so extraordinary that all existing explanations for its presence are fraught with difficulties and none of them could be considered watertight.”
Famous science fiction author, Isaac Asimov, called the moon, with its lack of atmosphere but a magnetic field, “basically a freak of nature.”
Dr. Gordon MacDonald, NASA Astronaut who pointed out, “It would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than a homogenous sphere.”
Carl Sagan pointed out that, “A Natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”
Dr. D.L. Anderson, Professor of geophysics and director of the seismological laboratory at the California Institute of Technology stated, “The Moon is made inside out and that its inner and outer compositions should be the other way around.”
Dr. S. Ross Taylor, Geochemist of Lunar Chemical Analysis said, “the problem was that Maria Plains the size of Texas had to be covered with melted rock containing fluid titanium. You would not expect titanium ever to be hot enough to do that, even on Earth, and no one has ever suggested that the Moon was hotter than the Earth. What could distribute titanium in this way?Only a highly advanced technology developed by someone or something that is immensely more technologically advanced than modern humans.”
Farouk El Baz of NASA: “Water vapour coming from the Moon’s interior is serious. It means that there is a drastic distinction between the different phases of the lunar interior that the interior is quite different from what we have seen on the surface.”
Lon Hood of the University of Arizona, “We knew the Moon’s core was small, but we didn’t know it was this small. This really does add weight to the idea that the Moon’s origin is unique, unlike any other terrestrial body.”
Ken Johnson, Supervisor of the Data and Photo Control Department during the Apollo missions said, regarding the seismometer tests, “The Moon not only rang like a bell, but the whole Moon wobbled in such a precise way that it was almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic damper struts inside it.” He is also quoted as saying, “Moon rocks have been found to contain processed metals, including brass and mica, and the elements H3, Uranium 236, and Neptunium 237 that have never been found to occur naturally.”
Personally, and this is purely speculative and based solely on my own intuition, but I feel as though the gaps in our understanding about the Moon are somehow related to the gaps in our understanding of our ancient past. I think that something incredible lies in these mysteries. Maybe its disturbing or maybe its miraculous, but either way the truth is preferred over a “noble lie” for me. We cannot move forward until we confront the truth, regardless of what it is.
Or maybe I’m completely wrong and am thinking too much into nothing. What do you think?
